Understatement of the Year Award
Posted: December 17, 2010 Filed under: Bailout Blues, The Great Recession, U.S. Economy, U.S. Politics, We are so F'd | Tags: Income Inequality, Tax Cuts for Billionaires, tax situation for the wealthy 55 CommentsFrom Bloomberg Business Week:
It’s a Great Time to Be Rich
“If the tax cuts become law, the next two years will be the best in living memory for many wealthy Americans to shield their income and fortunes “
A bonanza of new and extended tax benefits could make it as easy as ever for the rich to stay that way.
Under legislation approved by the U.S. Senate on Wednesday, Dec. 15, and now moving on to the House, savvy wealthy Americans would be able to capitalize on an environment in which their tax rates on income and investments remain at historic lows. Also, new rules would make it possible to pass on fortunes to heirs with less fuss and lower taxes than all but a brief period of the past 80 years. It’s a far cry from the 70 percent bite the federal government took out of the largest incomes and estates as recently as 1980.
“The climate we’ll have after this legislation is extremely favorable for wealthy families,” says Jeffrey Cooper, a professor at Quinnipiac University School of Law and a former estate planner who has studied the history of U.S. tax law.
The article goes on to list the incredible list of give aways to people that don’t need it in the Tax Cuts for Billionaires Act. Here’s one salient point to think about while eating your daily gruel and waiting for the debtor’s prisons and poor houses to re-open so you’ll have some place to go when the banks seize your home illegally .
The good news for the rich starts with income tax rates, which for top income groups would remain 35 percent , a rate enacted by former President George W. Bush in 2003. Except for a period from 1988 to 1992, the top tax rate has never been this low since 1931.
Happy Days are here again if you’re part of the investor class too! I’m getting nostalgic for Nixon. That says something, doesn’t it?
For the country’s wealthiest families, income from wages can be far less important than income from investments. According to a Tax Policy Center analysis of 2006 returns, 18.1 percent of all Americans’ cash income comes from business ownership or capital investments, compared with 64.5 percent from labor. For those in the top 1 percent of earners, however, business and capital income make up 53.6 percent of income and labor accounts for 35.3 percent.
Thus, Cooper notes, taxes on capital gains and dividends can be far more important to the rich than income tax rates. The tax compromise extends a 15 percent top tax rate on long-term capital gains and dividends enacted in 2003, which is the lowest rate since 1933. The top capital-gains rate was 77 percent in 1918 and, since 1921, its highest point was 39.9 percent in 1976 and 1977—though certain gains could be excluded from taxation.
No wonder Charles Krauthammer’s red face is all aglow with the spirit of the season!! It’s just not the prunes and the eggnog!!
How can any one defend this administration and its policies as being anything the worst of Reaganomics? At a time when we are seeing record long term unemployment, record foreclosures, record numbers of home owner’s with underwater mortgages, this is what we get. The same folks that benefited from all those bail outs from their failed business decisions and failed investment strategies are being subsidized again.
How can any Democratic congress critter go home and face any of their middle and working class constituents knowing full well they sold their souls to the Obama Company Store. I’m more convinced than ever that this country is in banana republic territory. Next step will undoubtedly be removing what little of the safety net was left in place after Reagan hit the country. After all about one half of U.S. children will most likely be on food stamps at some point in their life. Afterall, they could be out selling matches in the street!! And It’s Christmas time! Why not recreate Dickensian poverty? I’m sure we could use a few child work houses too! After all, it would contribute to the bottom lines of the people that really matter in this country!!
We wouldn’t want the rich to worry about paying for a government that serves the rich so well.
Snort. Snorkle.
But they do pay for it, Dario! All those under the table gifts and parties and ‘campaign contributions’ to their elected servants. That’s got to cost at least 0.0001% of their incomes! (snark, number totally made up).
Yup. Look at every congress critterz net worth and you can see the price they paid.
I meant that the rich don’t pay for the military that protects the interests of the rich, the infrastructure that serves corporate America, etc. That’s the government I was talking about, not the politicians because even though they get paid lots of money, that cost is minimal when we see the expensive part of government, like the military.
Every time I don’t think it can get any worse, it does.
Asshats.
Hillary 2012
You ain’t seen nothing yet. The next two years will be a horror that not even Reagan had the stomach for.
I think Buckley would be horrified! We’re passing Bircher stuff!
I’m so angry with the Democrats. They really are another face of the GOP. I want to vote out every single Democrat, even the faux-liberals that voted for everything Obama wanted the past 2 years.
I can’t believe how they’ve completely marginalized any voice but that of Corporate Amerika.
Reagan might actually been able to feel something, at least for rich people; unlike Obama who is a dead-inside psychopath who care for no one but himself. I just hope the country can survive him.
I’m having my doubts, frankly.
When Reagan was president, I wondered if they wanted the US to look like Bombay, with people naked and starving in the streets. I see now that I was right to wonder, just 25 years or so ahead of my time.
Old nightmare images of the Bowery are also going through my mind intermittently.
I agree with all your comments, but probably now is the time to identify the upside, down side and risk with this legisltaion and its effect on the economy. Obama is claiming the rich will stimulate business and hence jobs. I am willing to agree if I can see the evidence. However my life expeience gut is telling me this a charade.
The current claim is that this is a short term stimulis I maintain the rich have been and will continue putting their loot in the Caymen Islands or foreign countries where the returns are much better. Calculated Risk keeps a series of charts going that describe economic indicators and might be something to watch.
I suspect the response is going to be highly nonlinear as we seem to be in a procyclical environment. In the engineering world we call these unstable control loops and we avoid them at all costs because things can go to hell in a handbasket very quickly. By way of example, I would consider high leverage as a procyclical functin. Tax cuts for the rich is simply a enabling funciton for high leverage / risk situations. Dodd Frank and Basal are supposed to regulate high leverage. I think this is Geitners domain, however he might be treated as the little boy with high pants and ignored by the big guy’s. Certainly the Derivatives Regulation is being treated that way. Per the recent NYT Derivatives article, the big banks are in charge and Gensler is impotent in his committee. Mary Shapiro (SEC) has yet to show her cards on that front.I think she talks a good game but has little to show yet
I think Geithner is the architect of this mess.
I don’t think so. It’s Obama. He made the deal long before he got elected.
The current government is for the rich by the rich. The poker table has fewer and fewer players and the smaller the pool of buyers, the more worthless the papers will be. It won’t be easy for the poor, but it will be sweet to see the the collapse and watch those super-leveraged rich cry for another bailout that will not happen.
yup
I’ll still have food here at the farm, since I can grow it. So, I invite everyone to a feast when it happens, to feast on the hubris of the super rich and their lackeys.
What Obama is claiming is the same damned stuff the supply-siders claimed in the 1980s and it’s be completely debunked by empirical evidence.
Not even Republican Economists believe it.
You can tell when Obama stopped learning, can’t you? When he was in his 20’s.
The problem is there is no floor, no limit to their greed…and getting more just makes them hungry for more…there is no limit, there is no “compromise” that will satisfy them…. It’s like asking a shark to go on a diet…does not compute. We are to give them endless wars / bailouts / tax cuts.
Well, they can get away with it as long as politicians need their re-elections funded.
I would argue that it is the financial oligarchy that is in control. Geitner and Obama are mere tools.Dylan Ratigan has it narrowed down to 6 industries that control the government. Like George Bush, Obama just is not that smart and has so much on his plate that he is over his head and takes direction from some one. Orzag, Summers and Roehmer are gone and we shall see if any new direction comes in
I think he only listens to Geitner.
I know where Geithner gets his marching orders.
It should be interesting to see if christmas spending takes a big surge now that the tax cuts are in place. I suspect there is some economic data base out there that has spending broken down by the econimic strata.
So about the first week in January, those numbers will come out
Yeah, what would we do without National Crass Consumerism day?
Remember where your dollars are going! (H/T to Delphyne)
Workers Burned Alive Making Clothes for the GAP
OMG, the Triangle Shirtwaist fire redux, this time in Bangladesh.
I’m ashamed to be an American and to have clothes from several of those retailers.
Just wait until you read the thread I’m working on concerning what Big Pharma is doing. They’re just poisoning poor people and getting away with it. The FDA isn’t even paying attention.
They’re still at it? 😦
That’s a post I “look forward” to reading (not really, but you know what I mean.)
I am looking forward to this too. My mom has prescription drug-induced cirrhosis. And I have a toxic liver as well, from all the epilepsy meds. That is going to be a good article.
MM, that’s awful.
I have prescription drug induced muscular problems.
I was going to say the same thing, it’s like the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory tragedy.
Oh my God. The exits were locked? I don’t even know what to say.
Try our greed encourages slavery all over the world.
This is from a cached page for the Ha-Meem Group…Check out the monthly numbers they produce…
Assholes.
I know I’m running out to spend, spend, spend!
Actually the ones who benefit most from this don’t have to worry about spending, even without the cuts. As for me and my friends and family, we’re pinching pennies. Everyone is getting a book from me this year. That’s it. A book. The big dinner we put on will be our other contribution.
So – what are you cooking?
It’s pretty traditional. We are having a roast beef (rib roast, like 6 ribs. The partner is excited), yorkshire pudding, green beans and asparagus, mashed potatoes, gravy, assorted chutneys to go with the meat (my speciality), and pots de creme (chocolate cream) for dessert.
Most of it is home grown. We don’t do beef yet, though, so that’s coming from a local source. My partner cooks it all. I am very lucky in that he loves to cook.
Sounds fabulicious.
Love yorkshire pudding – so old fashioned and flavorful.
My dad loved to cook. It took his mind off business and he could use his hands. I grew up thinking all men did the cooking. Silly me!
You are doing it right, it’s the memories and family time that are most important. Love the big dinner thing, it’s what we do. Food related items are always my favorite things anyways. We splurge on fancy snacks (local) that we normally wouldn’t do.
This year I have a lot of memories and damn little family. 😦
I’m sorry to hear that, Branjor 😦
We do the same with the snacks. Partner and I will be fighting over kitchen time for the next week as we cook up goodies. I get it first! I’m making cheese :).
As I’ve grown older I’ve learned it really is the family time and memories, the big meal around the table, that matters. But there’s this damn competition thing with gifts. Noone in my family does it, but we still feel the pressure from advertizers, stores, friends and acquaintances.
From today’s NYT article – even the gray lady calls out the Obama status on Afghanistan
“For Americans, anxious about the war in Afghanistan, there is not a lot of comfort or clarity to be found in President Obama’s long-promised strategy review. ”
I put that in the morning thread. It was more than disheartening.
ah, just in time to leave for his Hawaii vacation…he’s leaving on a jet plane …
Isn’t it nice to be so rich and above it all?
Dak, I honestly read that bold print about the rich and thought that was a comment you made…it was shocking to see that that was the title of the article! I cannot understand how all this is going down. (I mean, I do understand…I am just frustrated about what we can do to stop it.) We are F’d, is the real understatement….that is just putting it mildly.
Yup, it was the TITLE of the article. They’re not even being shy about it any more.
Breitbart.tv » Flashback: Obama Promised 5-Day, Public Review of Bills Before Signing; Signs Tax Bill Within Hours of House Vote
No shame indeed, this reminds me of that song Lies, Lies, Lies by the Thompson Twins.
Consumer Reports Money & Shopping Blog: 51 million, mostly lower-income, will do worse under new tax law
My grandparents swore by Consumer Reports…
Yup. Most folks will fall under the category of it will do you no good and in the future it will come back to bite you.
Do Jewish people drink eggnog at Christmas? just asking since Krauthammer happens to be Jewish. I know this because a Jewish friend proudly stated that she attended Jewish a kids’ camp with him. If I remember, I excused myself to go to the bathroom so I wouldn’t have to reply to the comment ;-)……
Personally, I think he’s red faced because he’s an idiot.